We use a population resettlement program in Indonesia to identify long-run effects of intergroup contact on national integration. In the 1980s, the government relocated two million ethnically diverse migrants into hundreds of new communities. We find greater integration in fractionalized communities with many small groups, as measured by national language use at home, intermarriage, and children’s name choices. However, in polarized communities with a few large groups, ethnic attachment increases and integration declines. Residential segregation dampens these effects. Social capital, public goods, and ethnic conflict follow similar patterns. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of localized contact in shaping identity.
![You are currently viewing Unity in Diversity? How Intergroup Contact Can Foster Nation Building](https://sdgpolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/nick-fewings-BAZejJdZ57w-unsplash-scaled.jpg)
Unity in Diversity? How Intergroup Contact Can Foster Nation Building
You Might Also Like
![Read more about the article The rise of China as a cybersecurity industrial power: balancing national security, geopolitical, and development priorities](https://sdgpolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/shahadat-rahman-BfrQnKBulYQ-unsplash-300x200.jpg)
The rise of China as a cybersecurity industrial power: balancing national security, geopolitical, and development priorities
![Read more about the article How can diverse national food and land-use priorities be reconciled with global sustainability targets? Lessons from the FABLE initiative](https://sdgpolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/omer-rana-ikCQLiMTokw-unsplash-300x222.jpg)
How can diverse national food and land-use priorities be reconciled with global sustainability targets? Lessons from the FABLE initiative
![Read more about the article Experimentalist governance in climate finance: the case of REDD+ in Brazil](https://sdgpolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/sergio-souza-jBBlqHRlu8c-unsplash-300x169.jpg)